FountainCourt Homeowners' Association v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
FountainCourt Homeowners' Ass'n v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 360 Or. 341, 380 P.3d 916 (2016)
HOA construction-defect litigation flowing through to the subcontractor's commercial general liability insurer via garnishment. The HOA obtained a $485,877.84 negligence judgment against subcontractor Sideco (whose siding and window-installation work caused water-intrusion damage), then sought garnishment against Sideco's insurer AFM. The Oregon Supreme Court (Baldwin, J.) affirmed the trial court's garnishment judgment and held: (1) coverage is triggered when continuous property damage occurs at any point during the policy period, even if the precise amount of damage attributable to that period cannot be quantified — the insured does not bear the burden of proving per-period damage allocation; (2) the underlying jury's damages award was for "physical injury to tangible property" matching the policy definition of "property damage"; (3) coverage disputes in a garnishment proceeding are resolved by the trial court as questions of law without a jury, but the insurer cannot retry the liability or damages already established in the underlying judgment. Reversed only the attorney-fee award.
Controlling Oregon Supreme Court authority on coverage triggers for continuous property damage and on garnishment procedure for pursuing a contractor's CGL insurer post-judgment. Core authority for any Oregon HOA pursuing construction-defect recovery against a developer's or subcontractor's insurer. The case does not interpret an ORS Chapter 94 or 100 provision; it operates on contract-interpretation and burden-of-proof principles, so no statutes_interpreted FKs are set.